Professional’s Ranking
Professionals
- Good 10Gbps light-duty efficiency
- Each Sort-A and Sort-C connectors
- Inexpensive for its class
Cons
- Slows Significantly with bigger information units
Our Verdict
I like the X1 Max’s twin Sort-A and Sort-C connectors and 1GBps efficiency with smaller information units. However pace drops Significantly throughout bigger transfers.
Worth When Reviewed
This worth will present the geolocated pricing textual content for product undefined
Finest Pricing As we speak
Small, compact, and versatile, the X1 Max is good 10Gbps pocket data-transportation if you happen to don’t cope with giant quantities of knowledge. While you do, efficiency heads south in a rush.
What are the Teamgroup X1 Max’s options?
The X1 Max is as typical as a USB thumb drive will get by way of form. It’s a svelte black rectangle round 2.5-inches lengthy, 0.8-inches broad, and 0.3-inches thick. Weight is a negligible 0.42 ounces.
Nonetheless, typical stops there as you may inform by the 2 detachable finish caps. Pop off the bigger one for a Sort-A connector, and the shorter one for a Sort-C connector. No adapters required. Cool. See beneath.
Additional studying: See our roundup of the most effective exterior drives to study competing merchandise.
The internals are clearly 10Gbps USB and NVMe given the 1GBps high pace we noticed.
The five-year guarantee Teamgroup offers is outstanding for a USB thumb drive, although there’s no TBW (terabytes which may be written) ranking. To not give an excessive amount of away, however you’d be hard-pressed to exceed any such restrict given the X1 Max’s efficiency with bigger quantities of knowledge.
How a lot is the Teamgroup X1 Max?
On the time of this writing, the X1 Max was accessible in $34/256GB, $54/512GB, and $75/1TB variations on Amazon. There was additionally a $30/128GB model listed by the seller, however not accessible on Amazon. These are decently low costs given the 10Gbps efficiency.
Conserving in thoughts, after all, that commodity 5Gbps USB 3.0 thumb drives can be found in 64GB and 128GB capacities, from slightly below to only over $10.
How briskly is the Teamgroup X1 Max?
With information units smaller than 32GiB in CrystalDiskMark 8, the X1 Max hit Teamgroup’s claimed 1GBps learn pace. With a 2GiB information set, it reached the marketed 900MBps write pace. Nonetheless, as the dimensions of the information set elevated, efficiency decreased.
You may see the outcomes for the 16GiB and 64GiB (customary and what the opposite drives had been examined with) information hundreds beneath. It’s a quite startling drop-off.
CrystalDiskMark 8’s 4K exams confirmed an identical story. Good as much as 16GiB, slowing with bigger information units.
In whole, the X1 Max’s efficiency in our 48GB transfers was… okay. However the 48GB folder write was means off that of the SK Hynix Tube T31 — our top-rated 10Gbps USB stick. The folder write additionally torpedoed the X1 Max’s combination time.
When you thought the Teamgroup C212’s 450GB write was tragic, the X1 Max’s is positively Hamlet time — over 54 minutes. This isn’t the drive for actually giant information.
Word that write speeds throughout this super-large file stress take a look at dropped nearly to 2.5-inch USB HDD ranges, and infrequently dipped all the best way to 76MBps. The one slower 450GB whole write instances we’ve seen had been from these 2.5-inch HDDs.
The upshot is… When you insert the X1 Max and replica something lower than 2GB to it, you’ll see nice efficiency. Past that, and particularly with tens of gigabytes, issues get mundane in a rush.
Do you have to purchase the Teamgroup X1 Max?
This determination relies upon totally upon utilization. When you solely cope with small units, then the X1 Max with its super-convenient twin USB connectors and almost 1GBps efficiency are main promoting factors. Massive information units? Attempt one thing extra strong (and barely dearer) such because the SK Hynix Tube T31.
How we take a look at
IDG’s storage exams presently make the most of Home windows 11 (22H2) 64-bit operating on an X790 (PCIe 5.0) motherboard/i5-12400 CPU combo with two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 modules (64GB of reminiscence whole). Intel built-in graphics are used. The 48GB switch exams make the most of an ImDisk RAM disk taking on 58GB of the 64GB whole reminiscence. The 450GB file is transferred from a Samsung 990 Professional 2TB, which additionally comprises the working system.
Every take a look at is carried out on a newly formatted and TRIM’d drive so the outcomes are optimum. Word that as any drive fills up, efficiency will lower on account of much less NAND for secondary caching, and different components.
The efficiency numbers proven apply solely to the drive we had been shipped in addition to the capability examined. SSD efficiency can fluctuate by capability on account of extra or fewer chips to learn/write throughout and the quantity of NAND accessible for secondary caching (writing TLC/QLC as SLC). Distributors additionally sometimes swap elements. When you ever discover a big discrepancy between the efficiency you expertise and that which we report (programs being roughly equal), by all means—tell us.